Prescribing the disease as the antidote
Forgive me, Father, for I have sinned.
I’ve been reading about pop music again. To make matters worse, I have compounded my fault by reading a BBC preview about tonight’s “Bowie Celebration Prom.” Here is what it said:
“How to turn a David Bowie tribute from an evening of cover versions into something better? The key seems to be the Berlin collective Stargaze, a young group of post-jazz players who will be the backdrop against which a sequence of guest singers (including Marc Almond and John Cale) will perform Bowie classics. Earlier (7.30pm), veteran maestro Bernard Haitink conducts Mahler’s Third Symphony.”
I am having difficulties with some of the wording in that preview.
What is “post jazz”?
How can the word “classic” appear next to the word “Bowie”?
Blasphemously, the providers of this rubbish describe Bowie as a rock “icon.” In truth, he was an overblown representative of the trashy mass culture industry, which is not about music of any sort, but about advertising and money.
Remember H.L. Mencken: “Nobody ever lost money by underestimating public taste.”
I don’t mind – big of me, eh? – if those deprived of a decent education by generations of lousy state schooling and the dumbed down mass media want to get together to listen to trash.
But I do mind when the trash is imported into the realm of what formerly stood for quality. Classical music concerts are the antidote to the banal noises of pop music.
The devotees of pop music have hundreds of TV and radio stations which broadcast nothing but pop and rock.
Is it so unreasonable to ask that one station might remain clear of this disease?
(That review reveals very clearly the Beeb’s order of values: “Veteran maestro Bernard Haitink conducts Mahler’s Third Symphony” is appended as an afterthought.)
Furthermore, Father, I confess to being an elitist. But what’s the alternative – to be a mediocratist?